View Single Post
Old 04-04-18 | 08:53 PM
  #8  
Andrew R Stewart's Avatar
Andrew R Stewart
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 19,381
Likes: 5,527
From: Rochester, NY

Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB

Originally Posted by wschruba
Just so. I have found, despite their crude (by modern standards) design, they are by a wide margin one of the most dependable systems. They take abuse like no lube or poor adjustment and laugh at it. I have seen the crank fracture at the threading, though.

Must be those 3/8 bearings.

Bingo! the award goes to wschruba. As the rolling elements radius grows so too does the load capacity, as I was told the increase is geometric with radius.


So take a look at most all current bearing designs and note the tiny rolling elements sizes. Driven by the need for aero or integration bearings are becoming a secondary aspect, no longer is long bearing life the positive it use to be. Now it's about how little the bearing impacts other design aspects.


One piece cranks were made in an era when tolerances were vastly looser, bikes cost far more of one's yearly income and repairing stuff was wideplace. They filled their goals well. Andy
Andrew R Stewart is offline  
Reply