Originally Posted by
desmodue
I am in the same boat as the majority of people looking for a seat that isn't a pain in the @55. I get what Kontact is saying.
Yes it's true the width of the "sit bones" don't change, but they do not maintain the same distance from each other when viewed front to rear. One look at a pelvic bone image was worth a thousand words to me.
I have customers with sit bone widths exceeding the total width of the saddle.
Perhaps I am reading this wrong. I hope so. You need a saddle wide enough to support the sitbones if you want to have children someday. You CANNOT have a saddle where your sitbones exceed the total width and your weight is supported by soft tissue.