Originally Posted by
njkayaker
It's not really the definition (it's not how the word is used).
The point of copyright and trademarks is to have the owner have control how the thing is used or not used. You don't get to decide for them (otherwise, copyright/trademark laws wouldn't mean anything).
==============
You are using unusual "definitions" that are not standard usage, how people generally understand the terms, or supported by law or anything. It appears you are rationalizing.
It may surprise you to learn that the way I described advertising signage and graphics was
not something I made up.

It's a paraphrase of a definition I have to be aware of in the course of business - concerning the permissibility of different types of signs (a matter of zoning).
Thank you for your helpful participation in the discussion. Meanwhile, Biemme have responded in an apologetic way to say that the stuff I might get from the Hong Kong vendor isn't as good as what they made and they "do not have permission." Naturally, right? That's good enough for me. Not because that makes the stuff pirated, but because I'd rather do business with the friendly folks at Biemme.
Call it rationalization if you will, but it's much nicer making the decision on such a basis. If they'd been jerks and gotten all lawyer-y in reply, I'd have been tempted to get the HK goods anyhow just to spite them and dare them to do something about it.