Old 05-02-18 | 06:24 PM
  #7  
rhm's Avatar
rhm
multimodal commuter
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,810
Likes: 597
From: NJ, NYC, LI

Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...

Originally Posted by Trevtassie
If tightening the QR did actually fix it, it may be a broken connection in the hub, the Shimano hubs have the "earth" connected to the bike chassis. So there may actually be a connection being made because a QR can measurably compress an axle (which is why you set wheel bearings with the QR done up). Alternately , it could be the "positive" (hah AC, but you know what I mean) contacting the chassis, and the QR pressure uncontacts it. Best way to test would be with a multi meter, during a fault time. The earth terminal should be connected to the axle with zero resistance, the other terminal should have some resistance between the other terminal and the axle.
Right, that's what I've been thinking (emphasis on your first word). What worries me, in this scenario, is: the lighting system, both headlight and taillight, "should be" electrically isolated from the frame/fork. The tighter QR may have made a better electrical connection between the axle and the fork, but if the lights are truly isolated, as they should be, this wouldn't matter... right?

By chance, USPS brought me a new hub today. So I'm busily building a new wheel that may perhaps solve the problem, assuming there's a problem in the hub.

More later. Thanks, all, for your suggestions so far!
rhm is offline  
Reply