Old 05-09-18 | 12:21 PM
  #19  
base2's Avatar
base2
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,379
Likes: 2,020
From: Pacific Northwest

Bikes: Yes.

Originally Posted by HTupolev
That's impossible to say without knowing a lot more about the rider. People's ability to deliver torque relative to their weight can vary several times over.


If the OP is regularly grinding out cadences in the 30s as they suggest, I wouldn't be surprised if they could climb considerably faster on lower gears.
I don't disagree. At the time I typed, his actual cadence hadn't been mentioned. IIRC I stated If he was managing 70, his gears are managable (for him was implied by the one-on-one conversational tone of my post.) If he's doing 30, then he is most certainly in the right to be looking towards gearing.

In fact, given his patellar-fasciatis we now know about, I'm curious about his seat height being one possible cause for both. No power resulting in low cadence & exceeding high pressure on the back of the knee cap causing the patellar-fasciatis. I've never seen how he fits on his bike so we may never know. Also, I don't know if being comfortable at 110 rpm all day is as true as he thinks. I tend to be a spinner & 110 means it's time to shift. A cadence sensor would tell the truth.

Maybe he has only developed fast twitch muscle fibers and has never developed slow twitch due to the implied lifetime of flat land experience. I dunno, it's possible. In any case, my genuine attempt to pass on some nuggets of technique isn't the be-all-end-all of cycling wisdom. I'm not the Wise-man-o'the-mountain. Just a guy trying to offer help. Thanks though for pointing out that more conversation developed while I was AFK.
base2 is offline  
Reply