Old 05-14-18, 01:12 PM
  #22  
JonnyHK 
Senior Member
 
JonnyHK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: London
Posts: 2,420

Bikes: Baum Romano, Brompton S2, Homemade Bamboo!

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 474 Post(s)
Liked 204 Times in 129 Posts
Originally Posted by jefnvk
I guess by those definitions I would side that it was indeed careless, not dangerous, driving, at least from the facts given.
There is an interesting dynamic between all the different common law descriptions of the levels of an offence.

Accidental>Careless>Dangerous>Reckless and so on.

The police and prosecutors do have to be careful to pick the best charge depending on the evidence. Juries might just acquit on a 'higher' charge when they might have convicted on a 'lower' charge.

My favourite was always "depraved indifference".
JonnyHK is offline