Right on.
I also believe he is cherry picking that data from DC's review. Didn't he get much better results after they tweaked the firmware? In the end, PP is about 2% accuracy. Lots of low IQ folks can't wrap their heads around the math and laws that make the PP a reality though. They are stuck on DFPM as the only way to arrive at the data. And, most importantly, none of them have tried it.
Interesting. Say I'm riding a pair of Conti Gator Skins with butyl tubes before switching to a pair of Vittorai Corsa Speed tubeless. Everything else the same. How does it account for that significantly different rolling resistance?
How about rough roads versus smooth?
I can't quite get how it would account for rolling resistance changes.
Is powerpod the one that was talking about aero testing along with a strain-gauge power meter? I think that would actually be a pretty cool thing to work with. Could possibly dial in some aero refinements pretty quickly if it does it in real time.