Originally Posted by
CerveloJoe
Although what is being debated here is mostly speculation, it still creates a larger dark cloud over cycling at the highest level. How long are the governing bodies going to either turn a blind eye to this type of alleged activity and at what cost to the sport will it cause if it is allowed to continue. I'm not saying whether Sky/Froome are guilty or not. I don't know. There are people who do know however. Sponsor's are becoming more and more difficult to find and if this type of situation isn't eventually resolved, irreparable damage will possibly occur. Unfortunately, it seems that sponsor's, teams and riders are only interested in the short term and how much money and fame it brings them. If in later years, the truth that comes out of this for Sky/Froome turns out to be the same as for USPS/Armstrong, will these people feel it was worth it? I assume so if the monetary reward was lucrative enough. If this continues to be the reality, it totally sucks for the people who love this sport.
Fact: The official expert body (WADA) has declared that Froome HAS NO CASE TO ANSWER, the rest is just a load of armchair 'experts' and Froome-Haters speculating.
A lot of this online stuff is Americans (yes Americans) who still haven't gotten over their hero being exposed as a career bully and cheat. They now devote what spare time they have constructing a narrative that says 'our hero was a victim of a sport that's still as corrupt and dirty as ever'.