Originally Posted by
Caretaker
Fact: The official expert body (WADA) has declared that Froome HAS NO CASE TO ANSWER, the rest is just a load of armchair 'experts' and Froome-Haters speculating.
A lot of this online stuff is Americans (yes Americans) who still haven't gotten over their hero being exposed as a career bully and cheat. They now devote what spare time they have constructing a narrative that says 'our hero was a victim of a sport that's still as corrupt and dirty as ever'.
No...most of us never hero-worshipped Lance. And most new and accepted the man was a jagoff long ago. Froome is in all likelihood just as dirty, he just puts on a nicer personality.
The UCI is too embarrassed to have another winner dinged for doping...so they change the rules/procedures for him and not anyone else who got a ban for the same exact thing.