Originally Posted by akarius
Well Anthony I am going to have to eat my words regarding the reference thing, I did not look thoroughly at the site as I should have. Please accept my apology and disregard all the statements I said earlier about the credibility of refrence material regarding your sight. I was wong and at your request I will post this retraction on all the posts where that concern the subject of the validity of of the sight you recomended.
Thank you
This retraction is sufficient. I didn't want to claim that every last article on the WAPF site was fully refferenced, or that no one would want to challenge some of the references however I was at a loss to know which article you were reffering to. There are numerous articles on the WAPF site from guest contributors.
Regards, Anthony