View Single Post
Old 07-28-18 | 11:58 AM
  #39  
woodcraft's Avatar
woodcraft
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 6,016
Likes: 924
From: Nor Cal
Originally Posted by rubiksoval
You agree that riding rollers lets you "have a faster ride with less work?'

That statement makes ZERO sense. You ride faster by increasing power (so more work), or decreasing resistant forces. So already that statement is nonsensical.

So maybe you started producing more power at lower heart rates or something similar only because you rode on the rollers? Did you measure that? No, of course not, because hardly anyone had a power meter in the 80s and 90s.

So we're left with you thinking you rode faster because you want to think you rode faster because you spent the whole winter slogging it out on rollers. Not exactly empirical evidence, here, and when you get right down to it sounds like we're back to making stuff up.


A power meter only measures output at the wheel or wherever, so '80s or today it doesn't measure biomechanical efficiency.

If the left leg is working against the right leg (to grossly oversimplify) it will take more work to go a given speed vs if all the parts work efficiently.

Like an engine with the timing belt off a degree or two.

I'm sure you've seen beginning cyclists thrashing in an attempt to go fast. Would you counsel them to stomp harder, or to develop a more efficient pedal stroke?
woodcraft is offline  
Reply