Originally Posted by
rubiksoval
She was one of the few I was speaking about. She is certainly not the norm for this place.
Gotta face it, man, cycling as a sport and cycling as a hobby are two different things. People approach them very differently. While people can cycle for performance AND enjoyment, one has far greater demands if the goal is improving it.
This is a discussion forum. I'm going to respond to posts like I typically do. You can make the decision to troll my posts or not, but I'm not going to adjust my posting habits because you might not be able to control yourself.
No I can control myself. You are just wrong on so many levels is all. Sorry but its true, like you have been even in this thread about judging percentage that 'train'..or whether their regiment of training affects quantity of rest. Ridiculous assertions. For example. Let's say 10% train to disciplined regiment. Want me to recite who they are? Its a copious group of members here. It doesn't matter who does or doesn't train to a given regiment is the point. It is irrelevant to discussion about rest. Yes, more disciplined trainers are likely going to build in more rest but they can still over train. Get it? Such a simple concept See how you and I get off track? You are wrong and I respond.
So because you want to engage me, it is you who can't control yourself
I will not respond to you. Reason is simple. No common ground and best 'for forum decorum'. Selfish otherwise isn't it to bicker?..lol.
So respond to my posts, and I best not respond to you for forum etiquette and to save me a lot of time. How's that?