No kidding.
OP stated the ‘overwhelming’ reason he lives in Idaho is because it is bike friendly but then goes on to state that it isn’t bike friendly. Huh?
Did he seriously think that the Idaho stop law alone made it safer/friendlier for cyclists?
That’s seems pretty silly.
Someone would move to or stay in Idaho just because they made it legal to do the same thing all other cyclists are already doing in other states. Legal or not. Huhza?
And wouldn’t it dawn on someone that car drivers might not love the idea of cyclists blowing through stop signs which could in fact create the reverse of a bike friendly environment?