Originally Posted by
acidfast7
I'm providing examples, albeit my own so it is boasting as well (feel free to contribute to such behaviour unless there is nothing to boast about). I'm pushing out papers that can't have a single calculation error, do you think I'm going to run a hackintosh? This is what happens when a sign is flipped.
Retraction | Science
I think you neither need to start providing examples or bowing out of the conversation as all of your commentary has been unevidenced by anything you've participated in. Maybe, I'm wrong here, but so far it doesn't seem like it.
In all fairness, it appears the retraction is due to
an in-house reduction program which I interpret as software, not hardware. I ain't running a hackintosh either, but know it's possible to run OS X on a ThinkPad. I do run W7/W10/Kali/Arch/Debian on TPs and the batteries are replaceable by myself.
We'll agree to disagree. My bride is an artist who runs high dollar Macs. I know Macs are beautiful machines but at some point the money runs thin. In a perfect environment, nothing fails but we all know Murphy's Law too well and can only plan ahead.