Originally Posted by
Mobile 155
let me simplify this for you. If someone is working for GM and they are being paid to produce a profit for the stock holders that is what they should do. If however those same people decide to abandon their mandate and for some social concept decide to leave the profit making portion of the company they should lose their position. Just like a stock boy that will not bag groceries for a customer when that is part of what they get paid for.
If GM discovers adding an Ebike as an accessory can increase the sales of GM vehicles they should be recognized for their contribution to the stock holders and employees alike. That is how our system is supposed to work.
If someone disagrees with that system they are free to try to live outside of the system. They just shouldn’t be shocked when people don’t share in that vision.
And what happens to the car companies' sales and revenues when they fail to keep the appropriate amount of motor-vehicles on the roads to accomplish visible progress toward less traffic congestion, a better environment, and improvements in sustainability/climate forecasts? Do the people who fought for their jobs by upping sales still get to keep their jobs then, or do they get the blame for creating the situation where public opinion regarding automakers and oil companies is generally degenerating?