View Single Post
Old 11-30-18 | 11:19 AM
  #103  
PaulRivers
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 6,431
Likes: 44
From: Minneapolis, MN
Originally Posted by noglider
I believe more energy was lost in the automatic because of slippage and complexity, and also the shift points were not always optimized for fuel efficiency. I'm under the impression that computerization has pretty much solved these problems. Humans can no longer shift as intelligently as the new automatics. At least that's what I've heard. Not only that, automatics used to have fewer gears than manuals, and that's not true any more, either. I rented a Kia Soul with a 7-speed automatic.
FuelEconomy.org lists out mpg's.

2018 Honda Civic
https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=39568
https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=39567

Automatic / Manual
36 / 35 mpg (combined)
32 / 31 mpg (city)
42 / 42 mpg (highway)

Like you were saying...the automatic is rated 1mpg better than the manual transmission...

Last edited by PaulRivers; 11-30-18 at 11:31 AM.
PaulRivers is offline  
Reply