Originally Posted by
alan s
Not taken by eminent domain. The RRs obtained an easement with a reversion interest. It’s a complex subject, not easily discussed on a bike forum. The selfish, greedy adjoining landowners want money from the taxpayers, or to hoard the land. Personally, if it was my land, I’d welcome a trail.
My understanding was that eminent domain had been used in at least some sections. If that is incorrect I concede the point.
Why is it selfish and greedy to want to adhere to the terms of an agreement? Is it conceivable that even one landowner might have legitimate concerns or a different perspective than you?
BB