View Single Post
Old 12-16-18 | 10:49 AM
  #42  
cyccommute's Avatar
cyccommute
Mad bike riding scientist
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 29,210
Likes: 6,286
From: Denver, CO

Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones

Originally Posted by rm -rf
(the visual error is reduced by 12 times, since we measure 12 repeating sets of links. Measuring one pair of links would be too hard.)
Chain checkers
Yes, my Park Tool chain checker would show around 0.25% on a new Campagnolo chain. Like the comment above, those chains very slowly elongate, still within 0.5% after 4000 miles, but the rollers and plates get their own wear, making the chain more flexible side-to-side. These tools are quick, and can be good for keeping an eye on a chain's wear.

I think the ruler method is better.

(0.5% is fairly arbitrary. Would 0.04% or 0.07% work equally well?)

Ruler
I use the 1 inch and 13 inch marks on my 18 inch steel ruler. (The edge of this 100 year old ruler is dinged up.)

It's not easy to measure accurately. I grip the chain and ruler together at the 1 inch marker, then view the 13 inch mark. I line up the same edge of the central pin. I do need to have my eye straight on at each end, otherwise the viewing angle is noticeable.

The green line is 0.5%, it's just slightly less than 1/16 inch. ( 0.5% is 12*.005 = .060 inches, 1/16 is .0625)

This measure was at or just past the 1/16 mark (red line). I shifted the chain to big chainring, smallest cog to get the longest return chain line.
First, the metric system is your friend. Since 1mm is a little over 1/32 of an inch, it is easier to read than a 1/16” divided ruler. Your pictures show the problem with using a SAE ruler. Estimating measurements between divisions is difficult and leads to error.

But if the ruler measurement is difficult to do accurately, how is the ruler method “better”? Does either measurement tool result in less or more wear on the cogs? Honestly, I don’t think that the chain wear is critical enough that even if the chain tool measurement is highly inaccurate, it would make that much difference. Chain checking tools are accurate enough and it’s so much easier that you can do it more often.

__________________
Stuart Black
Dreamin' of Bemidji Down the Mississippi (in part)
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!






Last edited by cyccommute; 12-16-18 at 11:01 AM.
cyccommute is offline  
Reply