Old 01-11-19 | 09:24 PM
  #33  
Road Fan's Avatar
Road Fan
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 17,196
Likes: 761
From: Ann Arbor, MI

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Originally Posted by Tourist in MSN
Very good analysis. Thanks. This does help explain in part why the Forumslader USB charger can produce so much more power that other chargers at higher speed, it somehow forces the hub to generate more watts with more resistance at those higher speeds.

I can't understand a lot of this stuff, but the graphs towards the bottom of this page tell you what I mean about different USB chargers.
https://translate.googleusercontent....g9zRzdCuSHvqDA
Tourist, the equation in [MENTION=113466]steelbikeguy[/MENTION]'s paragraph labelled 1. is "Voc = K x f" which states that the output voltage of a generator increases as the speed of the rotation of the generator shaft. The equation can be derived from basic physics by any formal student of electrical engineering, and both steelbikeguy and I earned our EE degrees many years ago. It says that for the voltage to rise as the speed increases is totally natural, it's how generators work. The USB charger does not "forces the hub to generate more watts with more resistance at those higher speeds." The hub generates more voltage just because it is turning faster.

I didn't pay too much attention to the data that compares different USB chargers. I'm not saying there are or are not differences, rather I'm trying to say that if there are performance differences, they might be because of differences between the circuit designs of the various USB chargers under test.

Steelbikeguy, thank you very much for generating and interpreting all this data regarding the SON hubgen.
Road Fan is offline  
Reply