View Single Post
Old 01-16-19 | 10:09 AM
  #11  
Trocadile
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 154
Likes: 36
From: Boston MA area

Bikes: Reynolds 853 hardtail MTB; Titanium mini velo

Originally Posted by laffin_boy
And my question, for which i'm still searching for an answer, is whether that ideal trail figure for a bike with 20" wheels needs to be different from that of a "full-sized" 700c bike with it's "normal" 55-60mm trail. And if it needs to be different then why?
It may not need to be different but there are clear factors tending to make it less. As has already been pointed out, all other geometry being the same, smaller wheels will have shorter trail. And this being the folding bike forum - most 20" bikes under discussion will also be folders. Folder designers want to reduce the folded size and this will encourage steeper head angles, reducing trail and wheelbase, while increasing cockpit size. I would assume that folder designers want to increase the cockpit to wheelbase ratio for the best compromise of cockpit room and fold. There may also be the factor of the shorter head tubes in most folder designs (including BF). While I'm not sure about this (perhaps an engineer could comment), I would think a short head tube would be stressed more by a slacker head angle.
Trocadile is offline  
Reply