View Single Post
Old 02-06-19 | 02:29 PM
  #14  
79pmooney's Avatar
79pmooney
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 14,164
Likes: 5,295
From: Portland, OR

Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder

Originally Posted by speedevil
I don't agree with this, provided that your RD has sufficient chain wrap capacity. With proper capacity and chain length, the RD will handle any possible combination of front chainrings and rear cogs. There may be cross-chaining issues, but those can avoided by choosing different gears. Cross-chaining should be avoided, but it should not be catastrophic if you do it enroute to a different gear.

The real risk is when the chain is actually too short to fit around the chainring and the rear cog, and the results can be severe. Trashed RD, bent/broken derailleur hanger, and broken rear spokes - and worse - you winding up on the ground.
BTDT

Now I have run setups that had the RD completely folded back and the chain rubbing on itself running the small-small. (Triples) That combo only gets used for when long hills level out and I do not want to do a double shift, then have to reverse that double shift as soon as the hill steepens again. Never had an issue beyond the noise. Now, with more modern cranksets with their pegs and pickup teeth, usually I cannot even run the small-small without the bigger ring picking up the chain so it isn't even an issue.

Ben
79pmooney is offline  
Reply