View Single Post
Old 02-12-19 | 08:13 PM
  #2817  
avole
Banned.
 
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 1,030
Likes: 5
From: France

Bikes: Brompton, Time, Bianchi, Jan Janssen, Peugeot

Originally Posted by 86az135i
I'm not sure what the main argument is. But if it's helmet effectiveness. To me even if it decreases my odds of a head injury by 1% in the event of a head strike. That's $50 bucks well spent. Energy has to go somewhere. So in the event of a head strike, the helmet will absorb some energy and disperse energy over a wider area. You can site all the studies or statistics you want. I'm sure I can show any correlation I want with the right data. Causation is a different story. So I'll rely on physics.

If it's legislation. We shouldn't legislate laws that step on personal liberty. If it doesn't hurt anyone else then who cares. If someone wants to willingly or unwillingly off themselves or hurt themselves. More power to you brother.
Many laws do « step on personal liberty », that’s why we have them.
Never assume the human race is intelligent when all the evidence says otherwise.
avole is offline  
Reply