Old 02-13-19, 11:26 AM
  #117  
Johno59
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Cambridge UK
Posts: 852

Bikes: 1903 24 spd Sunbeam, 1927 Humber, 3 1930 Raleighs, 2 1940s Sunbeams, 2 1940s Raleighs, Rudge, 1950s Robin Hood, 1958 Claud Butler, 2 1973 Colnago Supers, Eddie Merckx, 2 1980 Holdsworth, EG Bates funny TT bike, another 6 or so 1990s bikes

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 331 Post(s)
Liked 332 Times in 185 Posts
Bottom bracket swing

Originally Posted by jamesdak
Totally not buying this.
At half gas CF,, Steel and Al are all pretty rigid. The bottom bracket stays pretty still and most of the power from your pedals goes into the drive train and this power goes into the rubber hitting the road. As you crank up to full gas the bottom of the frames start to flex from side to side. This lateral movement absorbs power. Pedalling in circles rather than squares helps reduce this swing but CFs greater rigidity reduces the power bleeding into the frame more than the others.
We are talking power levels on the cranks by legs that cruise above 25 mph for hours on end for fun. In other words if you go 25 miles under 50 minutes these properties are important - for the rest of us they amount to next to nothing.
Johno59 is offline