Originally Posted by
frogman
I agree robnol. But your statement didn't say the win would go to the one with the tech advantage, it was ambiguous. Your statement was: "EITHER races are determined by who can afford the most advantages or who actually is the better racer." So following your statement either one can win not just the one with more advantages. That is what prompted my question of what was your point. It didn't make sense. I know what you were trying to say though and I agree.
companies are always trying to sell products to the masses that will reduce weight more aero give u the edge ….if they are not lying them then the rider with every bell and whistle would seem to have an advantage over the low budget racer...would they not...or are companies preying on the gullable and the stupid promising things that aren't true