View Single Post
Old 02-21-19 | 01:35 PM
  #10  
dddd's Avatar
dddd
Ride, Wrench, Swap, Race
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 9,808
Likes: 1,781
From: Northern California

Bikes: Cheltenham-Pedersen racer, Boulder F/S Paris-Roubaix, Varsity racer, '52 Christophe, '62 Continental, '92 Merckx, '75 Limongi, '76 Presto, '72 Gitane SC, '71 Schwinn SS, etc.

Originally Posted by The Golden Boy
Funny, I have a 7803 FD and it's explicitly the WORST FD I've ever used.
Of course- the caveat is that I wasn't using it with a "modern" triple- so no ramps or pins. But those things are optimized for EXACTLY what they're designed for...
It's not the lack of pins that causes modern front derailers to struggle with vintage or aftermarket cranksets, but rather it is that these modern front derailers have inner-plate "step" features that are designed to work (only) with a specific tooth-count difference between the large and middle ring.

As for vintage front derailer's capacities, it seems that if the crank is a triple, then the capacity might actually be a little better in terms of vertical clearances, owing to the additional vertical (as well as horizontal) cage travel.
And whether or not one might use the small ring and small cogs at the same time might also impact the effective capacity.
dddd is offline  
Reply