Originally Posted by
parkbrav
The first time you reacted to this you said law abiding was for chumps.
Quote me saying law abiding was for chumps.
I'll wait.
The third time you said that you perceived there to be some sort of mitigation in your personal circumstances. Now what's your response?
I literally could not have been more thorough on this already.
That's a polite way of admitting that you have hi-jacked this thread and have prolonged this thread unnecessarily for weeks.
No. That's how conversation works. It morphed into slightly different circumstances, as the result of many people morphing it. That's what happens on an internet forum. You don't get to control who talks about what in a thread.
This is an interesting conversation that people are engaged in constructively. Your original scenario was talked out. The conversation morphed into alternate scenarios. People are having an interesting discussion about it. Not everyone is going to agree with you that this kind of riding is always bad and always wrong and always dangerous. And people who don't agree with you are not forbidden from posting that disagreement, even in 'your' thread.