View Single Post
Old 05-15-19 | 11:55 AM
  #398  
Abe_Froman's Avatar
Abe_Froman
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 2,524
Likes: 57
From: Chicago

Bikes: Marin Four Corners, 1960's Schwinn Racer in middle of restoration, mid 70s Motobecane Grand Touring, various other heaps.

Originally Posted by MinnMan
I know just enough to know what I don't know. And that includes not depending on manufacturers and marketers for technical expertise. For the rear wheel/front wheel question, I do understand that rear discs are used rather than front discs because front discs impair steering. But the relative effects of rear wheel and front wheel profile on overall drag is not something I've seen discussed by independent experts (and I don't count cycling journalists as independent experts. I prefer reading what the engineers have to say, preferably publishing in the peer-reviewed literature). If somebody has a pointer to something pertinent, I'd appreciate it.

On a tangential subject, the tendency to wider tires that marketers are selling ignores the importance of having a narrow tire in the front where the width of the bluff body matters. Most of the advantages of a better ride from a wider tire comes from the rear. Thus, quoting Hambini "From an aerodynamic perspective, the width of the rear tyre has little effect but the width of the front tyre has much more impact and therefore a 23mm front tyre is recommended irrespective of whether the wheel was designed for 25mm tyres. At speeds above 30km/h, it is more beneficial to have 23mm tyres than 25mm front tyres for aerodynamic benefit."
And from an aerodynamic perspective, a 1mm tire will be aerodynamically faster than a 23mm tire, even at speeds lower than 5mph.

The question is what provides the best combination of speed/comfort/cornering, etc. And I would argue that combination is what is driving the push towards larger width.

Though I do agree there would seem to be logic behind running a smaller tire in front relative to the rear.
Abe_Froman is offline  
Reply