Old 05-25-19, 10:55 PM
  #58  
elcruxio
Senior Member
 
elcruxio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Turku, Finland, Europe
Posts: 2,510

Bikes: 2011 Specialized crux comp, 2013 Specialized Rockhopper Pro

Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 875 Post(s)
Liked 346 Times in 230 Posts
Originally Posted by willibrord

You should still consume vegetables, just not sweet or starchy veges and stay away from grains and sugar. Sugar means fruit is off the list, maybe an apple or two per week. And we know sugar feeds cancer cells, so in the context of diet and cancer it should be the first thing to go.
Uhhh. How to put this...
While technically you're partially right, the motivation of the bolded part is completely wrong.

Firstly, yes, cancer cells get their energy from glucose, namely blood glucose. What else would they eat? Secondly, eliminating the food source from cancer cells would mean the imminent death of the patient as that would mean removing blood glucose. You can't live without it and you can't get rid of blood glucose via not eating carbs (except if you're diabetic or something).

Saying cancer is affected by carbs in a diet is the equivalent of saying cancer is affected by how much you breathe since oxygen feeds cancer cells (it really does).

Also for an otherwise healthy person, carbs in a balanced diet aren't going to spike blood sugars significantly (ie. not spike them above the completely normal 6 or 7 mmol/l range which you probably get from doing HIIT too. Also as far as I'm aware, spikes in blood glucose won't affect cancer growth.

It's one of those myths again, like meat causing acidity in the body etc.
elcruxio is offline  
Likes For elcruxio: