View Single Post
Old 06-26-19 | 11:59 AM
  #10  
Hypno Toad's Avatar
Hypno Toad
meh
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,742
Likes: 1,129
From: Hopkins, MN

Bikes: 23 Cutthroat, 21 CoMotion Java; 21 Bianchi Infinito; 15 Surly Pugsley; 11 Globe Daily; 09 Kona Dew Drop; 96 Mondonico

Originally Posted by mstateglfr
The challenge is asking what other poster's flattest routes are?
Well consider your challenge completed because you succeeded! Good work!


All my rides upload to Strava at which time Strava decides to change the elevation gain to whatever they think it is. Guessing how much elevation Strava will remove from my GPS recorded ride is a game I now play after each ride.
Strava shows a 36mi ride I did a couple weeks ago as having 285' of climb which is under 8'/mile. My GPS shows it was 1332' of climb. Go figure.


There is a 44mi out and back thats all paved path on an old rail trail which is 44mi and 512' climb which ends up being 11.63' and I am pretty sure that is actually accurate. Its a 1% grade for half the ride up and 1% grade for half the ride down, going both ways. The only 'climb' is an approach to a road where the trail used to go in a small tunnel under the road, but the trail now goes up and over the road. Its a whopping 15' high, maybe.
Elevation gain is a hard number to get, very few GPS devices are accurate. I use Garmin devices that use air pressure, which is worthless when a front is moving through. Simple mapping GPS (like phone apps) base elevation on map data, that's what Strava uses too. But I've fount that to be wildly inaccurate too. A few years back I did the Almanzo 100 and looked through my feed of friends that rode the same route - we ranged from 5,000 ft to nearly 10,000 ft - the accurate number is just below 7,500 ft.
Hypno Toad is offline  
Reply