Old 07-08-19, 11:28 AM
  #30  
T-Mar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,223
Mentioned: 656 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4722 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,046 Times in 1,882 Posts
Originally Posted by seypat
Now that I have looked at the rest of the bike, I found something to sleuth. Look at the picture of the rear DO/RD/etc. Look at the way the chainstay is cut at a 45ish angle where it meets the DO. Mine is cut at a 90. Now go look at @verktyg's beautiful Echelon in the Appraisals forum. Same 45ish angle. Could be a coincidence. Might be a connection. The pic is of my dropout...
The Comp TA and Turbo were sourced from both Tano and M-a-t-s-u-s-h-i-t-a. The latter is best known for their Panasonic brand and they also employed the acute angle cut on the chain stays of some of their better models (see pic). Given that they are a known source for some Turbo, this would be seem to be the more likely source. However, the serial number would tell us if it is a M-a-t-s-u-s-h-i-t-a frame, without a doubt.

T-Mar is offline  
Likes For T-Mar: