Originally Posted by
I-Like-To-Bike
Ya mean that testimony and complaints from people whose only involvement or knowledge of the incident is from viewing edited YouTube snippets aren't sufficient to indict the evil doer of whatever the offended parties of A&S deem appropriate?
It seems good enough to rouse the usual suspects of the tar and feather mob of A&S to a fever pitch.
The guy got out of his vehicle to hit a guy and was stupid enough to do it while being filmed by two people. You think he's got a valid defense? Seriously?