View Single Post
Old 09-08-19 | 04:37 PM
  #17  
big john's Avatar
big john
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Active Streak: 30 Days
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 29,339
Likes: 13,398
From: In the foothills of Los Angeles County
Originally Posted by xroadcharlie
Fist, Being lighter does not mean better for hills. Quite the contrary, A heavier person with a reasonable % of body fat might very well be faster if he has stronger legs. .
Being lighter is better if all else is equal. If a given rider loses weight he will climb faster until he starts losing strength. A person can be a great climber at a very low fat %. The only issue then is some with very low % may not have long term endurance.

With recreational cyclists there are so many variables you can't just look at fat% or even weight, within reason, as you noted. As an over 200 pound rider I suck at climbs but I sometimes drop younger, smaller riders.
big john is offline  
Reply