View Single Post
Old 09-16-19 | 07:33 PM
  #49  
350htrr
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,839
Likes: 57
From: Canada, PG BC

Bikes: 27 speed ORYX with over 39,000Kms on it and another 14,000KMs with a BionX E-Assist on it

Originally Posted by Rob_E
Personally, I care more about power limits and speed caps then whether or not you need to pedal it. But the law seems pretty clear on the pedaling issue in this case. The confusion seems to be on the part of the owner.

That is similar to a problem we're having in my state, though. If something falls into the "moped" category, it has to be registered, but the DMV won't register these low-powered, scooter things, so they become impossible to use legally, since they don't meet the state definition of e-bike, but they don't meet the Motor Vehicle department definition of moped. From an ecological standpoint and a safety standpoint, I'd much rather see something like this out there instead of higher powered options, and even better if it's replacing a car, but the law is slow to catch up.
Ding, ding, ding... and... There is the "fail in the "whole legal system" of what should be "considered a bicycle|"... Seems to me, that actually, pedaling the bike is/should be, part of riding a bicycle... and that is totally missing in some of these " so called E-Bikes"... IN fact you probably couldn't even pedal them to get anywhere if your life depended on it, and thus they become mopeds, IMO why...?? Because you do not need/or cannot actually even pedal them to go anywhere... Thus, they are just a way to get around the "LAWS"... It is that simple, to get a motorized bicycle to sell as a bicycle., Like that RCMP officer testified in court..

By the way, I am 100% on the side of allowing an E-Assist bicycle to go anywhere that a regular bicycle can/is allowed to go...

Last edited by 350htrr; 09-16-19 at 08:01 PM. Reason: add stuff
350htrr is offline  
Reply