View Single Post
Old 12-15-19 | 08:10 PM
  #15  
CliffordK's Avatar
CliffordK
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Active Streak: 30 Days
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 27,576
Likes: 5,435
From: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Originally Posted by shelbyfv
There's a good chance that if you need a 34, you may not miss the 52 vs a 50. There will always be weird situations and folks who imagine they understand more than the "herd" but the normal combos work for most.
True in many situations.

Personally, I was a late adopter of the 34, and mounted it specifically for one ride up in Portland that kicked my rear with the 39. Otherwise I would be fine for all my other riding with "Standard". But, chose not to swap back and forth between rides.

Of course, the overall gearing is a combination of what one has up front and behind, both high and low.

The move from 13/14T freewheels to 11T cassettes has also reduced the reliance on large front sprockets.

However, the other thing that has happened is a general move to both higher gears in the rear (11T), and lower gears in the rear (25T/28T/30T/34T/etc).

Say a freewheel, 14:21 gives one less than a 2:1 overall ratio.
On the other hand, a cassete, 11:33 gives a 3:1 overall ratio.

Say for chain rings 54/34 gives one about a 1.5:1 ratio. I.E. One can shift the 11/33 cassette, and have a few sprockets to spare on each end (to avoid cross-chaining), and still have gear overlap.

Personally I don't see any benefit of discarding the 50/52/54 sprockets to get something like a 46 or 48 and much more gear overlap.

Well, that is unless the 46 is the small ring.
CliffordK is offline  
Reply