Originally Posted by
63rickert
The technical novelties that came with introduction of the bicycle were ball bearings and pneumatic tires.
Ball bearings had existed, they were simply too expensive to use, and designers figured how to get the job done without them. Bikes created the demand for ball bearings. Bikes were the killer app that made ball bearings a thing. After a lot of false starts and dead ends the technique for making balls in bulk was the tech for making marbles. Toy marbles. Just start with small pieces of steel instead of small rocks. It was seventeenth/eighteenth century tech.
Pneumatic tires were completely novel. I want to keep them. All that's needed to make a tire is needle and thread. Oh, and rubber. Which means international trade is needed. Global trade has been a constant since the Bronze Age. It might be nice to try a tire with a casing made from Dacca muslin. From what is known of that fabric it would seem ideal. But the stuff only exists in museums. No one has known how to weave it for about 200 years. Preserving just that sort of knowledge is what Luddism was about.
All the other details that go into current bicycles are just that, details. A derailleur is a series of levers and pivots. Any Luddite mechanic can understand any derailleur. Or at least any mechanical derailleur. Electric derailleurs we won't even think about.
Luddism was always about valuing persons over commerce. Not hostile to nice things. Or more specifically not hostile to nice things made by humans.
Luddism was all about destroying and sabotaging technologies that threatened one's livelihood and way of life. It wasn't an esthetic preference for "nice" handmade things. There's plenty of historical literature about a the changes in roads and city structures necessitated by the widespread adoption of the safety bicycle, and the hostility this was engendering, only to be overshadowed by the introduction of the automobile a short time later. As to whether or not it was considered advanced technology, it is not a coincidence that the Wright Brothers started in the bike business.
We can argue all day about social movements and how they would have felt about technologies that didn't emerge for several decades after the movements died, but it's a pretty silly enterprise.