View Single Post
Old 05-05-20 | 12:13 PM
  #25  
SethAZ's Avatar
SethAZ
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,394
Likes: 334

Bikes: 2018 Lynskey R260, 2005 Diamondback 29er, 2003 Trek 2300

Originally Posted by Iride01
As long as that crank's turning, no one will know.

I have similar with my Shimano 105 cranks in an Ultegra 52/36 ring on my Tarmac. The profile sculpting just doesn't quite match. However the Ultegra cranks in the 105 chain wheels matches much better. Go figure!
I ran into a related issue while I was looking at power meters. I wanted crank based power, and I had to choose between either something entirely 3rd party, which would have required 3rd party rings and departed entirely from the Shimano Ultegra aesthetic, or something like the Quarq DFour which would mate up with Ultegra 6800 rings, or the DFour91 that would have mated up with the new Dura Ace generation rings (or apparently also R8000 Ultegra rings, albeit imperfectly). In the end the Stages L/R was my choice, being built on a bog-standard Ultegra R8000 crankset. Of course that means I'm locked into Shimano R8000 generation chainrings, but that's what I chose, and now I'm dealing with one of the ramifications of that choice. I'd still probably choose it again, knowing what I know now, despite my misgivings on Shimano's choices and offerings.
SethAZ is offline  
Reply