Originally Posted by
Classtime
I think it depends on your definition of performance. Flat proof performance=PT. Light weight flexible sidewall=Not PT. (I admit that I have not ridden either but I have researched because of my new TREK 620 designed for 27". I handled a Non PT pasela at the local shop and was impressed how "flimsy" it was. Some folks think a flimsy tire can't perform.
Thanks! I was thinking more along the lines of the the PT maybe having a bit of extra weight that would affect the rollability. As far as I can tell, that doesn't seem to be the case. I have a pair on the way.
Originally Posted by
mkeller234
I have both version of the Pasela. I honestly can’t say that I would notice a huge difference between them. I’ve always figured that the differences between my bikes were more significant than the tires. I usually trend towards the flat resistant tires because I often find glass along my ride.
Once upon a time I shelled out the money for high zoot challenge tires. I got so many flats that year that it didn’t feel worth it.
Either version of the pasela is a good tire. I’d say make the choice depending on what sort of roads and debris you will ride on.
Many thanks, I ended up going for the PT just because I'm in NYC and my wheels right now aren't quick release. So less potential need to have to take them off while riding, the better.