Old 05-11-20, 04:09 PM
  #9  
San Rensho 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,820
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 383 Post(s)
Liked 133 Times in 91 Posts
Originally Posted by vane171
Thanks a lot for explanation and reassurance. I will check the chain stretch tonight. I believe I can still measure it when the chain is dismounted if I put some tension on it. Cassette looks like new when clean, don't see any wear on it whatever. I think the shifting under load that scuffed the chainring was probably done by the original owner who had it for the first three years.

But last question remains - 172.5 vs 170 mm crank arms. I tried to search if there is thread on crank arms length but didn't find anything, I wonder if I should make new thread on it. I imagine it would have already been discussed and flogged to death (with everybody getting tired of it like the greasing thread) but maybe that should be in other forum sections?
Pretty straightforward. If you mash, get longer cranks, if you spin, get shorter cranks, also, shorter cranks give you more clearance when leaned over and pedalling in a corner. I can tell the differnce betwee 165mm cranks and 175, but you are not going to feel the diffefence between 172.5 and 170.
__________________
Il faut de l'audace, encore de l'audace, toujours de l'audace

1980 3Rensho-- 1975 Raleigh Sprite 3spd
1990s Raleigh M20 MTB--2007 Windsor Hour (track)
1988 Ducati 750 F1
San Rensho is offline  
Likes For San Rensho: