View Single Post
Old 05-12-20, 09:12 AM
  #27  
DorkDisk
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Kips Bay, NY
Posts: 2,212

Bikes: Ritchey Swiss Cross | Teesdale Kona Hot | Haro Extreme | Specialized Stumpjumper Comp | Cannondale F1000 | Shogun 1000 | Cannondale M500 | Norco Charger | Marin Muirwoods 29er | Shogun Kaze | Breezer Lightning

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 576 Post(s)
Liked 1,002 Times in 488 Posts
For sure, to the average person off the street, steel is a hard sell for bike frames.

Weight is an issue, but there might be another factor combined with it.

Simple, high impact visuals are important. The ongoing trend (onslaught?) of oversized everything has created a massive headtube. To visually match, the crowns of forks are of the same diameter. Steel does not like large, steel likes dainty. Large makes steel too stiff and too heavy. Al and crabon like Large, Al and crabon do not gain much weight from upsizing and gain massive stiffness. The upper models have wide crown crabon forks so the lower end models have to match the visuals as much as possible. A light and compliant steel fork would look silly on that fat head tube IMO; a fat steel fork would ride like an Al fork but weight 3x as much.

Interestingly, the oversized (bigger, more logos) trend was largely started by Cannondale, who were a pioneer of the Al fork. Below is a picture of someone else's beautiful Cannondale with a compliant and light steel fork as well as a pic of my Cannondale with fat Al fork.



DorkDisk is offline  
Likes For DorkDisk: