View Single Post
Old 05-15-20 | 02:48 AM
  #42  
Korina's Avatar
Korina
Happy banana slug
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 4,574
Likes: 2,530
From: Arcata, California, U.S., North America, Earth, Saggitarius Arm, Milky Way

Bikes: 1984 Araya MB 26L, 1992 Specialized Rockhopper Sport, 1993 Hard Rock Ultra, 1994 Trek Multitrack 750, 1995 Trek Singletrack 930

Originally Posted by bargainguy
I'm vertically challenged at 5'4. I played around with 165's and 170's on road bikes until I found folding bikes, and decided to experiment with much shorter cranks. My purpose was twofold: shorter cranks for easier packing of the disassembled bike in a suitcase, and let's see what they do to the power curve.

I had Mark Stonich of www.bikesmithdesign.com shorten a couple cranks, which I still have. An Ultegra triple and a 105 double, which started life at 170mm, now both at 148mm.

Power curve results were not encouraging. Easier spinning, which was nice, but greatly reduced leverage. Hills and wind became more pronounced, or maybe just my ability to deal with them. Felt like a spinning hamster wheel going nowhere fast.

In the end, I removed them and went back to my 165 and 170. Might dig them out again for a project or if I need a short crank for a particular frame setup.
148mm?? No wonder you had no power! Those would fit someone a foot shorter. You'd probably do great on 160's, but they're very difficult to find, so your 165's sound good.

(148. Golly.)
Korina is offline  
Reply