Old 07-05-20 | 06:30 PM
  #5  
kosmo886
Full Member
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 224
Likes: 11
Originally Posted by Iride01
Lower gear to go down hills?

Lower to me, and I think most is a lower ratio which is an easier gear. IE, the big cogs with lots of teeth on the rear cassette.

Going from a 48/32 to a 52/36 or 53/39 might be a big change for you. I've been riding a 52/36 for the last 5 years and am thinking of going to a 53/39. I used to run a 7 speed 14-28 rear with a 53/39 and found it easy enough for all but one very long hill in my area that suddenly steepened to over 10 percent grade shortly before the top.

So it really depends on your terrain for your ride and your fitness level. Take a look at the lowest ratio gear combination you routinely use to keep you from walking your bike up the hills you ride. If that will still be an available ratio when you put one of those cranksets on your bike then you'll probably be good. Also take a look and make sure the ratios you normally ride cruising won't be on the 1st, 2nd or 3rd cogs of your cassette (the low gear ratios) for those cranksets. I usually look to keep my cruising cogs on the 5th or 6th thru 8th or 9th cog of an eleven speed rear.
Ok, so maybe my terminology is a bit off. I’ve only been on a few rides so far, but on multiple occasions have tried to shift and found to be at the end of the gearing. Ie. Wanting a tougher gear. This means (in my mind) that I should change my gearing. Good news is if I screw it up I can always switch back and the chainrings are only $150 bucks so not a big deal experiment since the bike is new and I can get the same rings with different teeth for an easy switch. I guess it seems to me that the difference between 52 and 53 is very minor. Any reason to not just go for the 53?
kosmo886 is offline  
Reply