Old 07-12-20 | 06:08 PM
  #11  
Leinster
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 3,047
Likes: 302
From: location location

Bikes: MBK Super Mirage 1991, CAAD10, Yuba Mundo Lux, and a Cannondale Criterium Single Speed

Originally Posted by surak
The simplest definition of a natural climber is someone with above average W/kg over an extended period of time compared to shorter duration efforts.
That's only simple if you have a power meter. A much simpler version is "someone who does better going uphill than on flat terrain." And the OP seems to follow that definition, certainly as far as the group that he rides with is concerned.

Even defining it in terms of W/kg is a bit too simplistic, different riders use their power ratio differently, or can sustain it for different lengths of time. You get small sprinters like Caleb Ewan or Oscar Freire, and you get big climbers like Indurain or Dumoulin (Tom, not Sam), and you get puncheurs who are good on short climbs and can win in the Ardennes (Kwiatkowski, Alaphilippe, Rodriguez) who are not the same as the guys who can sustain it over long Alpine passes (Contador, Majka). There are guys at the top level who have better W/kg than others, but might be spent by the time they get to that last climb of the day and can't hang on.
Leinster is offline  
Reply