Originally Posted by
sfrider
They could make segments smarter. For example, the creator could specify stops signs, and the segment would then require a rider to come a stop. (Say < 2 mph.)
Another option would be a rest section, like a downhill. While they do allow sections to be ignored (at least I believe so, or maybe it's only courses), the segment creator could look at a reasonable safe descent speed, say 20 mph, and make it a recovery. Then when starting the downhill a timer starts, and you can do whatever you want during this time - stop, coast, roll downhill, pedal lightly, drink water, eat a gel, whatever. Then when you reach the end of the rest section, or effectively the bottom of the hill, you're on the clock again. If the timer runs out the clock starts regardless of where you are. This way you're given a certain time to get down a hill safely, have a sip of water, or whatever - and everyone gets the same time.
But, why?
The entire point is going as fast as possible over the allotted distance. Making rest periods, besides being impossible on strava, defeats the entire purpose.
It's the reason why you can't simply start and stop your time on a segment to take a break. The segment only measures when you first began and when you ended, regardless of what you do with your computer.
No way on earth anyone would actually abide by a <2 mph stop or whatever.