View Single Post
Old 09-18-20, 10:54 AM
  #88  
Koyote
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,096
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7118 Post(s)
Liked 11,276 Times in 4,812 Posts
Originally Posted by BoraxKid
That was entirely my point in that post you quoted; I'm glad we can agree on this as it is exactly why financial advice from 50 years ago is no longer relevant today--because markets have changed. As you said, interest rates are much lower today than they were in the past (and that's true of loans and investments, btw). Given that a lot of people don't even have $2000 in cash saved, advising people to just hand over their cash for big-ticket items really doesn't make much sense at all, since doing so would leave them more exposed to calamity.

It is much safer to make sure you can afford the payments, take the loan, and then try to pay if off ahead of schedule. Then if calamity hits, you might lose the item you financed to repossession, but you'll at least have your cash reserves intact to help weather the storm. It's really amazing that some people don't see the wisdom in that approach, simply because they are scared of paying interest.
If repossession is your fallback plan, then your main plan may be flawed.

Oh, wait, sorry -- I'm too old to understand this new-fangled modern finance.

Last edited by Koyote; 09-18-20 at 11:18 AM.
Koyote is offline