View Single Post
Old 10-31-20 | 03:18 PM
  #25  
Mojo31
New here
5 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Active Streak: 30 Days
 
Joined: Jul 2020
Posts: 15,480
Likes: 8,567
From: Tejas
Originally Posted by Iride01
I wouldn't recommend going blindly either by the manufacturers recommendation or even the effective top tube length. But for those that have nothing else to go by, it's still a good start. My only caveat would be if they know ahead of time that they have exceedingly long or short legs and arms. But conversation usually never gets to that point of asking here.

I'm surprised though that you had so much trouble on a 58 cm frame at 6' of height. I'd have to suspect that you go opposite of me and have short arms and legs for your 6 foot height. I have long legs and long arms for my 5'-11" height. I used to ride a 65 cm frame with no issues. I could even straddle the completely horizontal top tube flat footed.
Nope, normal inseam and arm length for my height. The Trek rec was based on height and inseam. I was surprised how big it was compared to my Specialized bike with 58cm ETT. Like I said, I was really having to stretch my legs at the bottom of the stroke.

I'm sure there is an explanation, but I haven’t worried about figuring it out.
Mojo31 is offline  
Reply