Thread: Addiction LXXX
View Single Post
Old 11-20-20, 05:33 PM
  #5781  
Bah Humbug
serious cyclist
 
Bah Humbug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 21,147

Bikes: S1, R2, P2

Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9334 Post(s)
Liked 3,679 Times in 2,026 Posts
Originally Posted by MoAlpha
This is often considered in the context of refusal to buy health insurance, risky behaviors, etc. Aside from the widespread social consensus that we offer medical assistance to those in need and ask questions afterward, there is unanimous agreement among ethicists that it cannot be done. In the context of an infectious disease, it also puts the society at greater risk.

There are, however, limits. My first encounter with them was when I was a neurology resident and the cardiac surgeons turned down my heroin addict stroke patient for his third valve replacement, necessitated by his ongoing use of dirty needles. They were right, of course, there being plenty of other indigent patients in need of their services, but it still came as a shock to me and my patient.
The health insurance issue is textured by price. And that brings up the question of price with the vaccine - who's paying? Is it taxpayer-footed? How are we tracking the double-dosing, and what do we do with people who take the first but not the second? It's a whole icky bundle.
Bah Humbug is offline