Originally Posted by
wphamilton
well obviously. I am advising correct methodology, not a methodology that would make one hypothesis look better.
Your idea of correct methodology is to ride a route multiple times in a short time span,
in case the road changes? Cmon man, let's stick with reality. The road isn't changing between rides -- if it does, everyone will know it.
Nobody asked you to repeat any tests. You wanted to know why someone shouldn't cherry pick the type of route, and I explained why.
I did not ask why someone shouldn't cherry pick data. You suggested riding the same route multiple times and comparing the results. I did that, but the results don't support your narrative, so now you're calling into question my selection of the route. By your standards,
any chosen route would be cherry picked, and therefore would be called into question.
If your integrity is ok with what you've presented, that's fine. Nobody is accusing you.
Maybe you shouldn't question my integrity, even in a thinly veiled way.