Old 02-07-21, 10:01 AM
  #5  
sweeks
Senior Member
 
sweeks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 2,556

Bikes: Airborne "Carpe Diem", Motobecane "Mirage", Trek 6000, Strida 2, Dahon "Helios XL", Dahon "Mu XL", Tern "Verge S11i"

Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 981 Post(s)
Liked 584 Times in 401 Posts
Originally Posted by Notso_fastLane
The variable tail like is likely one of these:
https://buy.garmin.com/en-US/US/p/518151
That technology is amazing. However, I'd still want to have a rear-view mirror so I could see if the approaching vehicle was actually a threat. I doubt the Garmin device can differentiate between a following vehicle with a 3-foot separation and one that's on a collision course. I'd be nervous relying on the flashing rear light to change the path of the approaching vehicle.
The video accurately cites the prevalence of "struck-from-behind" fatalities (from a study a few years ago by the League of American Bicyclists, I believe). The rider doesn't have a mirror... the cynic in me thinks this would weaken the sales pitch for the electronics.
sweeks is offline  
Likes For sweeks: