Old 02-10-21, 09:25 AM
  #8  
Unca_Sam
The dropped
 
Unca_Sam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 2,144

Bikes: Pake C'Mute Touring/Commuter Build, 1989 Kona Cinder Cone, 1995 Trek 5200, 1973 Raleigh Super Course FG, 1960/61 Montgomery Ward Hawthorne "thrift" 3 speed, by Hercules (sold) : 1966 Schwinn Deluxe Racer (sold)

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1739 Post(s)
Liked 1,014 Times in 696 Posts
For bibs: You put them on and they stay put, no waistband issues or constriction.

For shorts: You don't need to get undressed to poo (which you'll probably have to do at least once).

To echo what was said earlier about comfort: Skin/fabric interface will make or break your tour, which is where cycling shorts would excel, padding or not. I had sore spots under my sit bones after my first tour, but I was really green and rode 100 miles round trip. That was with padded knickers (not bibs). If I was dealing with cotton underwear, seams, and chafing, I could have done a whole lot worse.
Ride and ride and ride some more to get a feel for what you need. Short rides, long rides, there's just no substitute for listening to your body (when you're not miles from home) so you can make the tweaks you need.
Unca_Sam is offline