View Single Post
Old 02-12-21 | 08:51 AM
  #7  
chaadster
Thread Killer
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 13,140
Likes: 2,162
From: Ann Arbor, MI

Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada

Originally Posted by dsmyth12
What is actually a better measure of your power, normalised or average?
Normalized Power is not a measure of power, it is an expression of power variability in a workout, used for the assessment of training load and intensity.

It is the exact purpose of NP to reveal how a workout was done, i.e whether it was steady-state efforts or included peaky, high power, by comparison to average power. You could go in and look at a ride file or use graphs to see the same thing and get an understanding of the physiological cost of a ride, but having numbers like AP and NP make that really easy to do.
chaadster is offline  
Reply